Digital ICE: The High-Tech Dust Removal Found in Film Scanners technology connections

Digital ICE:  The High-Tech Dust Removal Found in Film Scanners technology connections



In this video we explore Digital ICE, an image processing technique involving infrared light, photographic film, and a dash of algorithmic magic.

A particularly good example of Kodachrome and Digital ICE:

Technology Connections is a YouTube channel dedicated to exploring technological history and unique technological devices and concepts. You can support this channel on Patreon by visiting the link below:

Thank you to all of my current Patrons!
Benjamin kord
Tommi Hares
Dakota Williams
Sean Spark
Lucas Hartbarger
Taylor Cuzela
twiglet
DavidLastres
Granger Meador
Jeremy Kitchen
Dane Peterson
Jason Wellband
Shane Belaire
Paul Emmerich
Max Burns
Sam Hodge
Matthew Rossi
Paul Craigie
Paul Williams
Brent LaRowe
Quinton Wilson
Aerospyke
Kieran Cox
Hunter Schwisow
wsh
Logan Kriete
Rafał Wiosna
Adam D. Ruppe
Audin Malmin
Eric Hansen
Noah McCann
Jason R Scheuren
Rufo Sanchez
Aaron Herbst
Bjørn Vegar Torseth
Yaniv
Matt Falcon
Stewart Harvath
Kevin Landrigan
Evan Papp
Jason Weathered
Jolyan g shaba
Stephen Youndt
Stephen Bell
Steven First
Howard Longden
Gianluca D’Orazio
Martin Granestrand
Joseph
Marty Connor
Wesley Van Pelt
Lorenzo Novara
Lee Lemoine
John Trevick
Elliot King
Paul Anderson
Gustaf Lindblad
Carl Yazbek
Nicholas
Matthew
Gary Generous
Daniel Mann
Harald E. Westlie
Daniel Newton
urbanhusky
Henri Hyyryläinen
James Holmes
Dave Anderson
Neil Hopwood
Duncan Middleton
Aric Vogel
Conor Killeen
Tyler Knott
Slone Fallion
KrzysFR
seagull
Robert Stadtmüller
Athanasios Kountouras
Gorka Alda
Jason Brammer
Sarah Symon
Francis Fisher
Tab Patterson
Philipp Thomasberger
Gustavo Carballeira
SkydiveWeee
Alex Smith
Nolan Johnson
Samuel Kadolph
Robert Toth
Matthew Giraitis
Ellis M. Eisen
Tyler
Michael Shick
Eric Wood
Kasper Guldmann
Joe Bond
Eidorian
Cubase Academy
Nikolaj Sørensen
Jesper Hansen
John Kesson
cpb
Anonymous49856739245764
Jason Ganiatsas .

Images related to the topic technology connections

Digital ICE:  The High-Tech Dust Removal Found in Film Scanners

Digital ICE: The High-Tech Dust Removal Found in Film Scanners

Search related to the topic Digital ICE: The High-Tech Dust Removal Found in Film Scanners

#Digital #ICE #HighTech #Dust #Removal #Film #Scanners
Digital ICE: The High-Tech Dust Removal Found in Film Scanners
technology connections
See all the latest ways to make money online: See more here
See all the latest ways to make money online: See more here

See also  ROYALTY FREE Technology Background Music / Science Presentation Music Royalty Free by MUSIC4VIDEO technology background free
See also  Maritime - Engineering The Future Documentary technology documentary 2021

31 thoughts on “Digital ICE: The High-Tech Dust Removal Found in Film Scanners technology connections”

  1. Several years on and I just found out that my parents have a stack of old negatives from when I was growing up, so have ordered a V600. It's new so is significantly more expensive than the Goodwill find but should be absolutely worth it.

    Edit: It is worth it, the negative scanning is superb. The quality of the film and camera used was not but the resulting images are still far superior to 30 year old prints scanned at the lower resolution of my MFU scanner. Some of these negatives are stuck together too, gah!

  2. Ex-Pro photo guy here: nobody cares about details such as noise and color rendition or jpeg. Many clients in the news business will only accept downscaled jpeg. Pros need reliability above all, high iso if you do sports and – what's actually the key to making money: the image. Nobody pays for a perfect photo of a tree in the park but for a shot quality image of Harry making out with Meghan you'll get payed really well.

  3. Big fan of yours. Your content is amazing. Small correction though: B/W flims like the Ilford XP line do use a C41 process and there is no silver left after development. So ICE works on them. And they are (or where) very wide spread among Pros. Used them since ´82 I think.

  4. I mean… You actually ARE making your work worse for using suboptimal methods. If someone explains in detail why, say, Jpg sucks(You're working with less actual data in the image file, so when you go in and try to boost things or fix colors or otherwise, the image file actually has less information to draw on, and you're more likely to end up with a mess on your hands, to say nothing of compression making things worse anyway. Edit in raw when possible, only export to Jpg when you're on a final distribution for the web. Export in tiff if possible when printing), rather than saying "Is all my work poop now?", you should instead say "A professional has taken time out of their day to give me a free consult and education course in a way that will allow me to make my work that much better. I should take this advice to heart and use it to make things better as I move forward".

  5. While an older video and I just came across it, it's still relevant today. I've been going through the experimentation process my myself to scan in my older stuff. Things to consider .. thanks!

  6. mate, you speak of stories like you're a 50 year old, but i'd say you're 30 y.o AT MOST, how old are you? and dopetastic content as usual

  7. You've ruined it!!
    I used to think camera lense's were able to magically ignore dust particles

    Edit: Ohhhh. Negative dust.
    I just didn't want to believe it was about that.

  8. I didn't notice anything in the before afters because of how dirty my screen is LOL
    Had to go back and look at it a few times
    (also 777th comment!)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *